 Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Jevon the Tall
Hey, anyone else have the 7&7 is "More Miserable" disc?...
...I can't help but feel the guy was grasping at straws.
|
|
|
| Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
oh, and I would be less confused about you and the tall one if you had a picture of you instead of him in your signature....
Stuart Pedasso |
|
| Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Stuart Pedasso
You're confused, I can get my gonch out of my crack, and now I'm finding that my alias isn't as bullet proof as it should be. Bloody hell - er heck, allow me to pretend that Stu is real. BDasso must have me confused with someone else who is tall and thinks that the big guy who plays the obnoxious fiance isn't that obnoxious. |
I'm sorry Mr Pedasso, I did get you confused with the wonderful Mr Tall for a moment. I have since edited....
My younger son argrees with the tall one about the obnoxious one.
| quote: |
Originally posted by Stuart Pedasso
As to the extra vowels ... I'm honoured to think that my neighbours to the south feel they have most favoured nation status and are the true centre of the universe.
Now about Songs of the Heart. What the hell was that? Nothing at all like the Lost Dogs who I happen to like. That song Mexico was great, why can't Terry write more songs like that? HUH (is that American enough for ya?) |
Yes we are the center of the universe, thank you.
SotH was by the band David Anus not the Lost Puppies so that's why it has a different sound..... come to think of it, most DA albums have a different sound from each other but that is another topic.
HUH is American enough for me.
BDasso
|
|
| Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
so is that a positive review of my review of the bad review of the bad review of the original review in question?
|
|
| Thread: Shotgun Angel question |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by dennis
Oh yes, I will buy the proper re-issue... no doubt of that! 
|
only the re-issue may be in doubt
of course you could buy the m-8 version and then re-work it so the tracks don't have the gaps and then burn it to a CD-R so it plays all the way through like it's supposed to do..... or not.
|
|
| Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by Stuart Pedasso
| quote: |
Originally posted by audiori
Here is my reveiw of Dave Slager's reveiw;
After a not long enough hiatus between posting his opinion,
Dave Slager brings forth another reveiw of an album he would not
have the talent to make himself. The problem with writing a reveiw
is the writer should give an unbiased and intelligent description
of the album for the potential listener. Not judging the material
on his own personal musical tastes. Mr Slager fails in these two
areas by comparing this album to other works he does like and
even comparing the album to the country flaired Lost Dogs albums
he apparently likes. If he doesn't like the style of the album,
that should not be reflected in the reveiw.
Throughout the review are various contradictions, how can "Taylor's
humdrum delivery and bland band arrangements" and "Outstanding
tracks include..." be descriptions of the same album?
Not only that, there is frankly more information about other DA albums
in this reveiw than information about this DA album. It is almost a
commentary on DA's career more than an album reveiw.
After reading this reveiw I know no more about the album than before
I read it. There is no in depth analysis of the albums content here,
all I learn is that this guy likes older DA albums and the Lost Dogs.
I give this reveiw one star out of five. |
Blah blah blah. Let's review the view ...
It's an opinion. It what they do. Siskel does the same. You get a sense of that a reviewer likes or doesn't like. Point of reference is fair game. If you don't like the style you say so. If you want to have your stuff reviewed a certain way, then send out the specifications of what you will accept as in a review. By the way the bland delivery makes sense when taken as a whole. And within there can be moments where it does rise above. I have a number of albums where I think they're not very good, but when I listen to them closely there are moments I go "ooh and ah" but later when thinking about the whole thing it's nothing that I remember.
1. You must like it and proclaim Terry a genius
2. If you don't like it, don't review it or we'll get upset
3. You can't make contradictory statements.
Even bad press is press. Someone took the time to think DA was important enough to review even if it wasn't as favourable as you'd like. I had an interesting side conversation with Jeff from Ping a week ago where I was apologizing for not really liking one of his albums. I wanted to, and there were a number of really great moments, but the overall impression never struck me. It was the style and delivery not the talent. He thanked me for giving him a review and taking the time to acknowledge the band.
I can hardly wait to post some more of my personally subjective reviews of DA albums that have no indepth analysis. |
Here is my review of Stuart’s review of the audiori’s review of Mr Slager’s review of…
… some album I can’t remember, but it was important at the time.
I think Stuart has his panties in a wad over the fact that someone outside of the critics world (that he so longs to be a part of), doesn’t agree or like a certain style of writing in said review.
I say to Stu,
1) First learn to spell the word Favorably correctly. If you are going to review an audiori from the USA, who reviewed a reviewer from the USA then you must learn to write as a person from the USA. We, unlike the rest of the world do not use an extra vowel.
2) Please pull you panties out and put on a fresh pair. You will look, feel and smell a whole lot better.
3) There is no third, I just wanted to use three numbers like you did.
Even a bad review of a bad review of a bad review is OK once in a while.
Please do post some of your in depth analysis of DA albums so we may stone you proper.
BDasso
|
|
| Thread: Has Anyone Seen |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by carl
All I'VE seen is a crapload of "baxturd" threads.... 
|
i fixed them for you carl 
|
|
| Thread: Future plans update... |
|
|
| quote: |
Originally posted by audiori
Terry is already talking about the next "major" release.... that'll
be exciting. We're also talking about some surprises that will
be available once that release is for sale.
j&e |
woo hoo
|
|
|
|
)
